首页> 外文OA文献 >The effect of Helicobacter pylori infection and eradication in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: A parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study
【2h】

The effect of Helicobacter pylori infection and eradication in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: A parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study

机译:幽门螺杆菌感染和根除在胃食管反流疾病中的作用:一项平行组,双盲,安慰剂对照的多中心研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: This study aimed to resolve controversy regarding the effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy and H. pylori infection in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.\udDesign: A randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial was performed in patients presenting with reflux symptoms. H. pylori-positive patients were randomized to receive either antibiotics or placebo for 7 days. H. pylori-negative patient controls received placebo. All received esomeprazole 20 mg b.d. for 7 days, followed by 40 mg o.d. to complete an 8-week course, and were followed up for 32 weeks by telephone.\udResults: In this study, 198/589 (34%) patients were H. pylori-positive and 113 H. pylori-negative patients served as controls. Baseline endoscopy revealed 63% Los Angeles grade 0A and 37% Los Angeles grade BCD oesophagitis with no difference between patient groups. Symptom improvement on esomeprazole was seen in 89%. H. pylori eradication was successful in 82%. H. pylori eradication had no effect on symptomatic relapse (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% CI 0.74–1.8; p = 0.5). Overall, H. pylori-positive patients had a lower probability of relapse compared to H. pylori-negative controls (hazard ratio 0.6, 95% CI 0.43–0.85; p = 0.004). Relapse hazard was modulated also by oesophagitis grade (BCD vs. 0A, hazard ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.5–3.0).\udConclusion: Relapse of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms after a course of high dose acid suppression took longer for H. pylori-positive patients than H. pylori-negative controls; however eradication therapy had no effect on the risk of relapse; ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT00574925.
机译:目的:本研究旨在解决关于幽门螺杆菌根除疗法和幽门螺杆菌感染在胃食管反流疾病中的作用的争议。\ udDesign:对出现反流症状的患者进行了一项随机,双盲,多中心试验。幽门螺杆菌阳性患者被随机分配接受抗生素或安慰剂治疗7天。幽门螺杆菌阴性患者对照接受安慰剂。全部接受埃索美拉唑20毫克/天持续7天,然后每天40mg。完成8周的疗程,并通过电话随访32周。\ ud结果:在这项研究中,有198/589(34%)例患者为幽门螺杆菌阳性,而113例幽门螺杆菌阴性患者为对照组。基线内镜检查显示63%的洛杉矶0A级和37%的洛杉矶BCD食管炎,患者组之间无差异。 89%的患者出现埃索美拉唑症状改善。幽门螺杆菌的根除成功率为82%。根除幽门螺杆菌对症状复发没有影响(危险比1.15,95%CI 0.74–1.8; p = 0.5)。总体而言,与幽门螺杆菌阴性对照相比,幽门螺杆菌阳性患者复发的可能性较低(危险比0.6,95%CI 0.43–0.85; p = 0.004)。复发危险也由食管炎等级(BCD vs. 0A,危险比2.1,95%CI 1.5–3.0)调节。\ ud结论:高剂量抑酸疗程后H导致胃食管反流疾病症状复发。幽门螺杆菌阳性患者比幽门螺杆菌阴性对照组;但是根除疗法对复发的风险没有影响。 ClincialTrials.gov编号,NCT00574925。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号